🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.